420
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by yakultdrinkr@lemdro.id to c/world@lemmy.world
  • Hamas-run government says Israeli strikes on Jabalia refugee camp in Gaza killed at least 195 Palestinians, with concerns raised by the UN that these could constitute war crimes.
  • Evacuation of foreign nationals from Gaza is underway, with 320 already crossed into Egypt; about 7,500 are expected to leave within two weeks.
  • The strikes targeted Hamas military leaders and infrastructure, with Israel’s campaign responding to Hamas' cross-border attacks from Oct. 7.
  • U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken is set to visit Israel and Jordan to discuss the conflict and the need to minimize civilian casualties.

Media Bias Fact Check (Reuters):

Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 54 points 10 months ago

Actual Reuters headline:

Hamas says Israel's strikes on refugee camp kill more than 195 people

OP’s headline :

Gaza says Israel's strikes on refugee camp kill more than 195 people

[-] bpmd@lemmy.world 64 points 10 months ago

URL says Gaza, Reuters changed the headline after it was posted.

[-] yakultdrinkr@lemdro.id 44 points 10 months ago

No editorializing from me. Reuters changed the title after I submitted the post. You can see it cached by Photon here:

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] febra@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

I don't see a problem here. I trust their numbers. They have released lists with all the people killed by Israel before and parts of those lists were confirmed by relatives living abroad. "Hamas-run X,Y,Z" is just a cheap way of trying to delegitimize palestinian deaths.

load more comments (33 replies)
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Gaza's Hamas-run media office

Its weird seeing both Hamas and non-Hamas government related bodies. Kind of confusing juggling Gaza without Hamas, Gaza with Hamas, and Hamas's militant wing specifically.

[-] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Hamas is the defacto government of Palestine for close to ten years now. It's hard to untangle because they are genuinely intertwined. There isn't a significant difference between "government of Gaza" and "Hamas".

[-] HumbertTetere@feddit.de 3 points 10 months ago

There's more to Palestine than Gaza, so while your 3rd sentence is very much true and more central to the issue at hand, the first one is quite incorrect and might lead people to forget about Abbas/Fatah.

[-] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Hamas is literally the elected government of Palestine. They are the authority in Gaza that releases these numbers.

Correction: Hamas is the government body of Gaza, not of all Palestine, which includes the West Bank.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

True, but it’s not like that election wasn’t ripe with controversy around its legitimacy. At the very least there was notable voter intimidation being practiced by a militarized group.

[-] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 10 months ago

I'm certainly not endorsing the Hamas leadership of Gaza or their legitimacy, but the fact remains that there isn't a real distinction between "Gaza leaders" and "Hamas" at this point.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Hamas is literally the elected government of Palestine.

Hamas is the government of Gaza, not all of Palestine. Palestine also includes the west bank which is under Fatah/PA leadership, they lost a civil war to Hamas in Gaza after Hamas was elected there. They haven't held another election since.

[-] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 10 months ago

Thank you for the correction, I have edited accordingly.

[-] snek@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You could also correct the part about them being voted in. They had around 40% of the votes in a multiparty election, kicked out their opposers and took over. The current population of Gaza is 50% under 18, most people don't live beyond 65 due to low life expectancy, and that last election was 16 years ago. They were not democratically elected and the majortiy of Gazans haven't voted for them.

[-] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

That's how voting works literally everywhere. If you count the people that don't or can't vote, American Presidents are elected by like twenty percent of the population, and the winner doesn't even have to get a majority of the actual votes.

The statement that they were voted in is a true statement, so I see no reason to correct it because you don't like that fact.

[-] snek@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They won seats but never formed a proper government. Sure it's a true statement if you want to be pedantic but it's missing the relevant context. It's not a nice and decent election in a normal and nice environment (thanks to Israel).

[-] snek@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Thag sucks. But maybe it's Reuters changing their headlines?

[-] yakultdrinkr@lemdro.id 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You're right. Reuters changed it after this was posted.

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

So we are suppose to trust them equally as with that hospital attack.

[-] Sparlock@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Hamas never made that claim.

It was a doctor being interviewed by al-jazeera. Even then it was a mis-translation of what he said that western media just ran with and never fact checked.

Please stop spreading misinformation to serve as a way to delegitimize one side. There are plenty of REAL facts you can use.

this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
420 points (91.5% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2543 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS