Asklemmy

43940 readers

418 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

289

What's a single player PC game you can't get enough of? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by agelord@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

378 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just because it has random level generation/is a roguelike does not mean it has endless replayability. Generally, if you have seen most random events and it's not really challenging anymore because you got "too" good at the game, it loses its appeal for many, as it did for me.

What I'm asking was more in the sense of, have I missed things? Is there more content than I thought there was? I thought for a roguelike it had pretty limited alternative options to see. Essentially, what makes your 100th run different from your 99th run?, and the answer for me was "not much"