this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
379 points (90.6% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2712 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody is going to invade for humanitarian reasons. That only happens for very weak nations that have no international support.

The government of Israel has amazing international support, first class weaponry, outclassing all of its neighbors militaries by orders of magnitude, and a ambiguous nuclear strike capability.

They could literally take every one of their oppressed civilians, drop them into a vat of acid, live streaming on the internet indefinitely, and nobody's going to invade.

Give countries something to fight over, some material resource, and there will be a war, water, energy, access to trade, but humanitarian philosophies are things few people are willing to die for.

[–] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who said anything about humanitarian invasions? Why are you arguing against something you made up?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You said That's exactly what Hamas wants to see because that's what gets Israeli to lose international support and prompts Arab nations to invade.

I had assumed your Arab nation invasion was due to the death of Palestinian civilians. In your scenario why are the Arab nations invading?

[–] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because from their perspective someone invaded their land and is now vulnerable to getting kicked off it. The only reason Israel exists is because it's supported by the US and Europe. Take away that support and Israel goes away.

The intended result for Hamas is for Israel to respond with actions that erode the very support that they depend on for security against invasion from surrounding arab nations that don't need any new reasons to attack Israel apart from the very existence of Israel in the first place.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even if all external countries cut off military aid, Israel still is sitting on nuclear weapons. It's unlikely anyone would try to invade them, they don't want to get nuked.

But in this scenario over the course of 5 to 10 years, they would be less able to power project beyond their borders. That's true.

But let's not forget the The geographic neighbors, the military peers, are incredibly weak. So Israel becoming weak doesn't really make their jobs any easier