this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
126 points (81.5% liked)

World News

38978 readers
3114 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Quote: "We must teach Israel a lesson, and we will do it again and again. The Al-Aqsa Deluge [the name Hamas gave its 7 October onslaught - ed.] is just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, a fourth. Will we have to pay a price? Yes, and we are ready to pay it. We are called a nation of martyrs, and we are proud to sacrifice martyrs."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Limitless_screaming@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Advocating for a "win at all costs" strategy is something you should accuse people supporting the murder of dozens of people because there's a Hamas leader amongst them (still disputed) of.

I don't want civilians to be harmed and I don't support terrorizing people until they retaliate. those two qualities make me a better person compared to any occupation government supporter (person on the other side). lets say that I support the murder of civilians until Hamas achieves their objectives, that would only bring me down to their level, if not a little higher.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

no matter what's on the other side.

You're redirecting now and trying to walk it back, but those are your words.

[–] Limitless_screaming@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Am I? Lets put the quoted words back in their original context:

if you have to choose the lesser of two evils, then the occupation government will not be your choice, no matter what's on the other side.

Let me break that down for you:

  1. if you have to (means if you had no other choice but to do the given task)
  2. choose the lesser of two evils (means that the two options are bad, and you're about to choose the least horrible one)
  3. then the occupation government will never be your choice, no matter what's on the other side (means that the occupation government is so bad that you cannot sink lower)

BTW everyone can see what you're giving boosts to on Kbin. It's very weird that there are two people on the same platform (kbin), with the same position on this conflict, who have the same weird habit.