this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
1430 points (97.5% liked)

memes

10269 readers
3241 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As opposed to geo-engineering our way into global warming like we have been?

"Oh no, don't try anything! We might be too successful."

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Warming is bad, so cooling has to be good. Is that your logic?

[–] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, I'm just pointing out the fallacy in your comment that carbon emissions aren't geo-engineering or that reducing carbon emissions isn't either. Also that any actually geo-engineered solution, as per your definition, is going to be far less effective than the literal centuries of concerted effort to destroy the environment.