this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
34 points (97.2% liked)
Formula 1
9054 readers
110 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donโt want to become formuladank.
Up next
F1 Calendar
2024 Calendar
Location |
Date |
๐บ๐ธ United States |
21-23 Nov |
๐ถ๐ฆ Qatar |
29 Nov-01 Dec |
๐ฆ๐ช Abu Dhabi |
06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I agree, but in general it's very hard to achieve close racing while also allowing broad freedom to engineer your car, particularly in a formula that is so aero-dependent. CFD and wind tunnel time is ruinously expensive, and the more permissive the regs are the larger the problem space you need to explore to find the fastest car design. Consequently, it's easier for a well-heeled team to just outspend everybody else to optimize their car into victory (see Merc until '21 and Red Bull since the new formula began).
WEC is having some luck with its "downforce design quota" approach, but even so they can't get really close racing over an endurance race without BoP adjustments, which is something I don't think the teams will countenance.