this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
239 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2407 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Once he has a conviction, the GOP will immediately dump him. How can you be sure? Trump did lots of things that would normally by disqualifying but somehow the GOP still supports him.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Add a double line break to separate your thoughts from the quote.

Good question. I'm not sure. The current talking point is that he's fine because there's no conviction. I suppose they could move the goal posts, but hopefully enough of them respect the law enough to not cause trouble.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

but hopefully enough of them respect the law enough to not cause trouble.

You're gonna be disappointed.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

with convictions.hes barred from running in several states, so it's just a non starter.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's not barred until someone declares him barred. Who's to say that the GOP state leadership won't let him on the ballot anyway because fuck you that's why?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GOP isn't a lawmaking body. There are rules in various states about who can be on a ballot.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, but who is tasked with enforcing those rules? Who, specifically, makes the call saying Trump can or cannot be on a ballot? In red states, the answer to those questions is "The Republican Party."

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He only has to get knocked off in like, one state, for him to be non-viable.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, he actually has to get knocked off in several

Colorado, for example, will not matter because they've voted blue for the last 2 decades. Michigan will matter because it's a swing state where Trump needs to win. But even if Michigan does kick him off the ballot, he could still easily get enough from the remainder of the swing states. He'd need at least 2-3 more swing states to not go his way before he'd become non-viable.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point is that if he's convicted of a Federal crime, he by default can not be on the ballot in many states. Its big enough that it wont matter. Depending on how it all goes down, there is a very good chance he won't be on the ballot in GA. If that happens, he's also off the ballot in Louisiana.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You keep missing the point. Him being removed from the ballot is not automatic. Whether or not it should be is irrelevant. If the SoS in GA wants to keep Trump on the ballot, he's going to be able to do that until a judge shuts him down, and maybe not even then. Same with LA or any other red state. It would be far from the first time the GOP just ignored the law because fuck you that's why.

Look at what we've seen with gerrymandered maps in the past. We've seen multiple occasions where the courts tell states to redraw the maps, and they just stall out and defy the orders until it's too late, then they say "it's too late to redraw the maps now; we're gonna just have to use the old maps I guess. Golly gee darn, I wonder how that happened?". And what did they get in return? GOP control of the House.

Who's to say they won't do the same thing here? "Sorry, but the ballots were already being printed while we went through the appeal process. It's too late to print all new ballots now, so I guess Trump's name is just gonna have to stay.".