326
Firefox Development Is Moving From Mercurial To Git (groups.google.com)
submitted 1 year ago by pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For a long time Firefox Desktop development has supported both Mercurial and Git users. This dual SCM requirement places a significant burden on teams which are already stretched thin in parts. We have made the decision to move Firefox development to Git.

  • We will continue to use Bugzilla, moz-phab, Phabricator, and Lando
  • Although we'll be hosting the repository on GitHub, our contribution workflow will remain unchanged and we will not be accepting Pull Requests at this time
  • We're still working through the planning stages, but we're expecting at least six months before the migration begins
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

As someone who's too young to have used anything but git, it's kinda sad that it seems I'll never get to use anything else

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I forgot what it was but I used something else trust me you don't want to use that.

It's a rather unpopular idea on lemmy, but sometimes a monopoly is good thing. git having a monopoly in version control is a good thing

[-] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 2 points 1 year ago

100% this. Git is defacto for good reasons. ๐Ÿ˜‚ Feel free to try the others out though ๐Ÿ‘

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

There are very good reasons why Git prevailed. The previous generation of SCMs were terrible. Most of the ones that came around the same time as Git (distributed SCMs) got lots of things wrong. Git is complex but it's flexible, it doesn't try to force any particular way of doing things on you, which means you can make it work with any flow you can think of.

[-] thomask@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

Nothing in tech stands still. If you want a glimpse of a possible alternative future check out Pijul. And I don't know an example off-hand but the idea of doing version control on ASTs of program code rather than flat text is an interesting concept that hasn't taken off yet.

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Git seems to have reached a status of "good enough" to the point where it will probably stand still for quite a while. There just isn't anything that offers benefit significant enough to justify the bother of switching (that I've seen so far, I've seen pijul before).

Plenty of things do stand still. We're still stuck on qwerty keyboards for english.

[-] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just find yourself an antiquated Microsoft aligned company and maybe you'll get to taste the bitter fruit that is TFVC. I use it daily and it's.. Different.

[-] sizzling@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I miss using tfvc. Everything except for branching worked pretty well in visual studio.

Branching worked fine if you didnt have more than 2 or 3 too.

Sadly branches are pretty useful so git it is.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Be the change you want to see. Start an open source project using mercurial. Host it somewhere here

https://wiki.mercurial-scm.org/MercurialHosting

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
326 points (99.4% liked)

Firefox

17846 readers
71 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
k_o_t@lemmy.ml