Linux

48364 readers

382 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

117

Why is openSUSE so... weird? (thelemmy.club)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by bdonvr@thelemmy.club to c/linux@lemmy.ml

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

After a couple years on Fedora I decided to do one more Distro hop- to one I have little experience with, openSUSE.

But it seems the everything from the installer, philosophy, package manager, configs, and general way of working is just very different than every Distro I've tried before (Debian/*Buntu, Fedora, Arch, Gentoo)

Like what's up with YaST? It's like a system-wide settings/configs program plus a package manager front end unique to openSUSE?

And to update grub it seems the best command is "update-bootloader" - for example. This isn't standard on anything else afaik. Is there anywhere other than practice I can learn all of these quirks?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheEntity@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm more curious of the implications. Is KDE considered more popular in Europe?

[–] chri_ho@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think so. GNOME is more an American thing what you can see from its similarities to the Mac OS desktop layout which is still not that popular in Europe. KDE is also a German project and more similar to the Windows layout. And Windows in the last time often steals ideas from KDE^^

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 year ago

People always say GNOME is more like macOS - but as someone who really likes the macOS UI I really cannot stand GNOME3. I've tried but I just can't do it

[–] gaw@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But Flatpak is very European. And KDE Kirigami is very Asian. Shall we call it best of world model? 🤭

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So would the American package format be .gun and take up way more space then needed

[–] zingo@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Hahaha, .biggun is more appropriate.

As we can see this in battlestations all the time and of course the American flag and the Texas flag on the wall.

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

I always had the impression that OpenSuse and especially KDE is most popular in Germany.