334
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders said Sunday he doesn’t know that a ceasefire is possible in the Israel-Hamas war with “an organization like Hamas” involved.

“I don’t know how you can have a ceasefire, (a) permanent ceasefire, with an organization like Hamas, which is dedicated to turmoil and chaos and destroying the state of Israel,” Sanders told CNN’s Dana Bash on “State of the Union” Sunday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Nope, I removed it due to the "r" word. There are other words and phrases you could have chosen, you chose poorly. Perhaps you need your head examined.

[-] havokdj@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

So why would you remove it rather than give me the opportunity to edit the word out?

It's pretty clear that I was not being ableist because the other party does not have a mental handicap of any kind. So it is okay to use other phrases meant to shock and offend someone but not that specific word? How is calling him a dumbass or an idiot any better? In the context of ableism, if he were to have a mental handicap, those words would be equally as offensive.

I hate to say this, but if you are going to partake in political discussion, you have to get ready to hear things that will be offensive to you. Essentially everything that I wrote has been censored because of a single word that is synonymous with so many other words.

I also would like to make it clear that I have a condition that would be categorized as "offensive" by that word, and even then I still fail to understand how that word would be any more offensive than any other word relating to belittling someone's intelligence, that was the entire point of my choice of the word, to convey OFFENSE. It is okay to use offensive language when it is not connected to hate or hate speech.

That is precisely why I think my post was actually deleted was because you do not agree with what I said. If you can prove to me exactly how that word would be any more offensive than the other choices, then I am totally open to what you have to say (and I actually mean that).

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Using the "r" word, in ANY context, is a rule 6 violation and is not allowed to stand. You either did not read the sidebar or intentionally chose to ignore it.

Either way, the comment gets removed. End of discussion.

[-] havokdj@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I'm posting from mobile so I was not aware of that, but I had read the rules previously and was not aware that this was not allowed per board rules.

Regardless of what I think though, I am sorry for what I did, I was ignorant of that rule and had not known that it wasn't allowed here. I genuinely thought you were just singling me out and am now aware that you are just doing your job.

Once again, I am sorry, I will try to do better.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's all we ask! Rest assured, when comments are removed, it's not personal. We don't have that kind of time! :)

On mobile, getting to the sidebar varies depending on the app.

Voyager makes it easy, tap the three dots in the top right hand corner and select "Sidebar".

Boost is the same deal.

If you're in a mobile browser, the Sidebar button should be front and center (which is weird because "side".)

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
334 points (92.8% liked)

politics

18888 readers
3107 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS