this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
618 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4475 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A year after promising viewers a “red tsunami” in the 2022 midterms, only to be left with egg on their faces after the GOP drastically underperformed, Fox News was once again wondering what went wrong after Democrats romped to victory in statewide elections on Tuesday night.

Despite recent polls showing President Joe Biden deeply underwater with voters and even losing to Donald Trump in several battleground states, the Democratic incumbent governor easily won victory over his MAGA-endorsed opponent in deep-red Kentucky. And over in Ohio, a state Trump won by eight points in 2020, voters overwhelmingly passed an amendment ensuring access to abortion care in the state’s constitution.

The continued drag that undoing Roe v. Wade has had on the GOP was especially apparent in Virginia, where Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin had promised to implement a 15-week abortion ban if the GOP was able to gain unified control over the state’s General Assembly. Instead, not only were Youngkin’s hopes of a Republican sweep dashed, but the Democrats now control both chambers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MacGuffin94@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I still don't think that the full impact of COVID is being accounted for in polling and voter outcomes. Yes the first wave hit blue areas hard and fast due to population density but with the vaccine and the ever growing amount of time it has been available I have to imagine it is almost exclusively hitting red areas now. COVID has not gone away but vaccinated people aren't dying at nearly the rate of the unvaccinated of which that group is pretty exclusively GOP or at least Maga. When some of these elections were coming down to the thousands of voters 3 years ago what happens when thousands of dedicated GOP voters are now dead?

[–] Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I did the math a few years ago because I couldn't find anyone else who had published it. This is rough and IANAM (mathmagicman).

Every single day 8,000 boomers and above die, and 12,000 people turn 18 and those numbers are actually accelerating. If you use existing data to estimate conservative/liberal and likely voters within those groups it works out to a delta of 10,000 per day on a national scale. That's 5,000 votes switching every single day. That might not seem like alot. Because it really isn't. Out of 155 million votes cast, 10,000 is .006 percent. But here's the thing. It's cumulative. And it just doesn't stop. It is relentless. it's 300k a month, 3.6 million per year. And that pace is accelerating. Between 2020 and 2024 it's a 15 million vote difference. By 2028 it's 30 million. It used to be that people age into conservatism. But that is not happening with millennials. The demographics are changing, and changing quickly. The most conservative group in the country is dying. While the most liberal group is rising.

We just have to hold on to democracy for a few more years. This will all be behind us. Another 10k today.

[–] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 57 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have a feeling you "aged in to conservatism" because that's when you finally had money and humans are generally shit when it comes to "fuck you I got mine" but speaking as a millennial, that's just not happening. My generation's retirement plan is to die at our desks hopefully in a way that creates a lot of work for our bosses. Although on the less cynical side of things, I also tend to think that generally people are becoming more tolerant over time.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For the most part I have aged into liberalism. Older I get and the more shit I have seen.

Before: What do you mean institutional racism is a thing? I am not racist, no one I know is racist. Oh sure there are skinheads, but they are in jail. Since I don't see it, it must not be there.

Now: I just saw my friend who is black get treated like he was a dangerous criminal because of the crime of walking.

Stuff like that for example. I am doing well, I got mine. I want everyone else to get there's as well.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

aged into liberalism

Elder millennial here. Same. Grew up in a conservative, religious house hold, thinking we were some kind of bastion of morality, while the blue team was dead set on blending babies down into a paste for their satanic rituals n' shit. Started actually paying attention to politics in the Clinton presidency, but ofc was hyper-focused on shit that doesn't matter (relative to actual policy, anyway) like his affair, so cue the confirmation bias.

Then Bush happened, but by then I was actually thinking critically, so there was a lot of "wtf, I know he's on our team, but this isn't right". I was still a fucking idiot though, so I landed in the "bOtH siDeS arE teH sAMe!!" trap and championed the Libertarian party for a bit.

Eventually realized the LP, despite having some sincerely decent concepts on paper (shoutout to the non-aggression principle), boiled down to just handing corporations the reigns of the nation; and that the notion of the free market policing itself is a laughable pipe dream (reality check for pretty much any Libertarian proposal: "What would telecoms do with this proposed power?").

And I couldn't support the blue team because... um... well there was the situation with Clinton's blowjob... and, uh... hmmmm... why the fuck have I been vilifying them all this time?! FINALLY took a closer look at the real left's goals, and not just Fox's boogeyman fantasy version, and FINALLY realized I'd been drinking the right's kool-aid from basically birth all the way through the Libertarian phase.

Fast forward another decade-ish and 2016 happened, which really pulled off the last shred of veneer that used to present the GOP as anything other than seething hateful cultists: that was the kick in the ass that made me realize that I've got some catching up to do, and urgently. Haven't missed an election since, big or small: solid blue.

The really important bit here: none of ^that is unique. It took some blundering in the dark to realize that I was... well, blundering in the dark; but I was raised alongside a horde of other kids whose parents "shifted right as they aged" and just didn't question the boogeyman fantasy shit until we got out of the house, and then turned left. Then more left. Then ALL THE WAY LEFT.

And it's not just in blue bubbles, either - I was active duty in the military when we switched from Obama to Trump; the military definitely leans right, but it's not absolute as it's often presented. Even there, a significant portion of the servicemen and women I interacted with were on track wit their own version of my rant here. People in general, but millennial and younger especially, are REALLY sick of this neonazi, christofascist shit on the red team.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's kind of amazing how much the military still leans right after all the Trump shit.

The draft dodging, the incredible disrespect for the military, the obscene bullshit like the hurricane marker incident, the dictator worship, the subservience to Putin, and of course the coup. I would think military people would be better at recognizing incompetence at least.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A couple redditers put together a list of links to articles highlighting each of Trump's attacks on our own military, from policy to just disrespectful shit like his "I lIkE pEopLe wHo wErn'T cApTUrEd."

Ignoring the shit he did against every other slice of our nation, and JUST focusing on things that hurt the military/vets, there had to be around a hundred links.

I definitely converted a few people with that list.

But yeah, the right's kool-aid is a potent drug - it's easy to just keep chugging without question.

[–] PigsInClover@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you still have the link to that post?

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, the original got deleted. Looks like there have been a few attempts to recreate it though: found one that looks decent, but reddit's being fucky with the comments actually showing up in the thread they were posted - it's a 3 part post and only one shows up, but if you look at the user's comment history you can see them all back to back. This link should bring you to the correct page, ctrl+F "PT 3 -.-" to jump to it. It's reverse chronological, so the the pt 3 is the last, with the 2nd and 1st appearing under it.

Infact, fuggit, I hate directing traffic to reddit, and I've got the pages open now. Gimme a min and I'll just get the list + links over as a post here.

Edit - Here ya go:

https://lemmy.world/post/8041636

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

the notion of the free market policing itself is a laughable pipe dream (reality check for pretty much any Libertarian proposal: “What would telecoms do with this proposed power?”)

Ah, the good old tango of

"Yeah, sure, we could do That Thing with the proposed powers, but we'd NEVER EVER do That Thing, we're not evil after all. We just ABSOLUTELY NEED the capability to do That Thing right now. K, thanks.

Whoops, we did That Thing."

I completely agree. With both points. Add to it the rapidly fading religious influence.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I remember Gen X saying much the same thing about their retirement plans, too, though.

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Regarding the steadfast belief that "conservatism is dying": no it isn't. Christian schools, home schools, Christian colleges, and even regular schools, communities and colleges are pumping out kids that have the beliefs of their parents. I live in a rural area, and work (hypocritically) for a Christian based organization. I'm surrounded by young minds that are perfectly comfortable with the ideals of the religious right, and vote.

Society has been saying it for years... We said it when I was back in college. "Bubba in the white house is going to be the best! We'll undo all the hell Reagan and Bush did!" then Newt Gingrich (sounds like a disease...) made his "Promise to America(tm)" and everything got fucked.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I will say that the trend, year over year, for xtians has been they have been going down at roughly 1% per year, every year, for many years now. I think it is things like this that explain why the cons are getting increasingly radicalized in their positions and in their tactics. They have been denigrating the notion of democratic norms (the well-actually "this is not a democratic country" stuff that they love to pull, for instance). Their more wonky members starting laying the groundwork way, way back, according to McLean's Democracy In Chains.

https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2022/09/13/modeling-the-future-of-religion-in-america/

I mean, the fact that about 1 in 3 is unaffiliated is quite staggering. I can remember a time where even admitting this was seen as rather "edgy", now it's going to earn a shrug.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

This is why they want religious schools, school vouchers, private schools, etc. It's segregation light. This way they stay in their echo chamber.

But the data shows religiousness is going down. The ones that remain are becoming more radical.

This is also why they want Fox, to appeal to more than the religious.

[–] PizzasDontWearCapes@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People have been saying that conservatism is aging out since at least the 90's. Instead we see resurgences throughout the years.

[–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Some people have been saying that the current resurgence is more of a death throe. I truly hope so, but I'm worried.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

It used to be that people age into conservatism

It used to be that being conservative did not require you being batshit insane.

Yes batshit insane conservatives existed, but so did reasonable people supporting reasonable sounding policies by conservative politicians who behaved in a respectable manner.

While I believe it's still possible for reasonable people to be Conservative, it's not possible for reasonable people to support Republicans with their mouth pieces like Magorie "Jewish Space Lasers" Green being treated like someone with opinions worth listening to.

Damn dude, I needed to read this today. That’s amazing!

[–] Jesus_666@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You need to keep in mind that 2023 COVID is a different beast than 2020 COVID. The currently most common strains tend to be less hard on the body as the virus has started to adapt to human hosts.

I still wouldn't recommend people to go unvaccinated but it's not quite as suicidally irresponsible as it used to be. Still irresponsible, though.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but the elderly GOP base is getting it for the 2nd or 3rd time without having been vaccinated. It's just as hard on them if not harder.

That said I don't think it's moving the needle as much as MAGA politics are.

[–] derphurr@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What bizarro world do you live in? It's no longer a novel virus. Most boomers have been exposed or infected by COVID, also a great number (majority) of them got vaccinated. So by now there are miniscule number of boomers without natural or vaccine immunity. The vaccines boosters do little here in terms of death, because very few boomers are currently dying from COVID.

Hospitalization rate of over 65 was

16.4 per 100,000 during the week ending August 26 2023

Death rate is a fraction of that.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone I know who was vaxxed and boosted told me it felt between a cold and the flu. Which granted not fun, but considering the alternative much better.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And it's a hell of a lot better than long Covid, especially before we knew more about what the duck long Covid was going to look like.

[–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

You can still get long COVID even after being vaccinated (at least that's what I've read) but it's much less likely

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shhhh if we don't talk about it they'll never figure it out

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We’ve been talking about this since COVID hit. They’re too fucking stupid to accept the truth.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember how the cons were cynically thinking it was going to hit the "urban" people harder and the worst among them were cheering that on. Whooooops.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They’re always thinking that the world is more dumb than they are and hilariously never coming to the realization that it’s because they're so dumb that they think that.

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It also was and still is most fatal for older people, who generally lean more towards the Republican side.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I think there are also a couple more factors. In a time when early detection and treatment gets the best outcomes, the right-wingers are more likely to believe that it isn't serious, so they're less likely to test and less likely to try to get paxlovid (or be outside the 5-day grace period).

And even if they know they're sick early and want to get paxlovid, people who live in rural areas have less access to healthcare in general - and some of their doctors may not believe in paxlovid. Which really sucks for those people.

All that said, the are definitely health care discrepancies for minorities, and those disproportionately affect Democrats (mostly).

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Um polling is on the current population. Unless there's a long, long pause between the poll and the vote it really won't matter much.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Polling is on the current population of people who are willing to answer polls. If the poll is done by blind calling people what are the odds you would even answer the phone?

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And people are less willing to give out data to an unknown entity than ever before.

Previously you'd answer surveys because you wanted to be represented. Now you don't answer surveys because you know it may just be used to target advertisements or messaging for your opponents.

[–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They also generally call lan lines. Who has a lan line these days?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago