Games

16714 readers

487 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 developed in just 16 months, report claims (www.eurogamer.net)

submitted 1 year ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A MW DLC was developed in 16 months. That’s not unusual. The scumbags that are charging the price of a full game for a DLC is the problem.

Warzone was the first time I had been into any COD game since MW4. I was actually impressed how good it was. Then it continually went downhill further and further which each horrible money-grubbing decision.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm super confused at this narrative trying to say 16 months is "short".

As if time === quality.

Hell, lots of games only have a year before launch.

It's totally more about treating this DLC like a full game.