this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
425 points (95.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6620 readers
571 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It is a pretty great book, although it's a shame that Heinlein spent so much of his time being a douchey libertarian warhawk.

This idea was expanded upon in The Expanse series as well, with the added benefit of using small asteroids and pushing then into highly elliptical orbits designed to hit Earth at random times anywhere from a few weeks to several years later so your Inner System opponents have to spend a huge chunk of their resources watching for them without knowing if/when any other rocks will hit.

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's funny, because tracking big rocks months/years in advance is what we currently do really well, and iirc we update all trajectories of all known objects orbiting earth at least every 11 days, and the main problem is figuring out which is which when they are maneuverable, not where they are going.

There's currently about 750 000 things being tracked in earth orbit. The total number of asteroids is about twice that, so without upgrades we can still refresh each object every month, and with active space flight I'd guess that would be done much much more often.

Although, doing the math, enough Epstein drives (guesstimating tens) on a smaller asteroid could yield up to 1 m/s² acceleration, meaning an asteroid could traverse the distance from asteroid belt to earth in about a week.

[–] nBodyProblem@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It’s not nearly as easy as you’d think in the case of rocks being dropped from the moon. The crux of the issue is that:

  • We are not well equipped for space situational awareness in cislunar space
  • There are many orders of magnitude more volume to observe in cislunar space than in the space below the GEO belt
  • The previous two bullets mean it’s difficult to find a non cooperative target once you lose it and the precision of any observations is poor. The sheer volume of space that need to be observed makes this issue nearly impossible to fix.
  • Trajectories in cislunar space are highly chaotic due to multi-body effects. Combine this with poor estimates of position and velocity, and our predictions of the future diverge rapidly from truth when propagating cislunar orbits.

The Tl;dr is that we can’t effectively track non-cooperative objects in cislunar space over any extended period of time.

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is fascinating, could you perhaps link to some reading on the topic?

[–] nBodyProblem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure! AFRL released a document called a primer on cislunar space targeted towards military personnel that does a great job of explaining it in easily understood terms.

[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, if the rocks are sufficiently small and plenty as well as stealth coated (or at least painted black) they are still a nuisance with deadly potential.

[–] PflaumeKordel@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago

In The Expanse the group responsible for the attack stole the most advanced stealth coating in the Expanse universe to paint the asteroids, leaving Earth unable to detect them with anything but their most powerful sensors.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The expeditionary force series expanded that further with guided asteroids accelerated to near light speed orbiting the galaxy.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What time scale is that story on, that a 300,000 year delay on a weapon is feasible?

[–] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Normal human time scale. The projectiles have jump drives. When a object jumps it retains its momentum.

So basically they have these projectiles traveling at 30% of light, with the ability to jump into position to strike a target.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well that answers my second question, which was how something could orbit at 200 times orbital speed.

The answer is there was never any orbit.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They have jump drives homie, when they start to escape they can jump back

Also speed wouldn't be an issue if the orbit is extremely extremely elliptical.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, this is 200 times escape velocity, there is no possible orbit at that speed, just careening out to another galaxy, floating endless in the galactic cluster, or leaving the cluster altogether.

Any orbit would take millions of years anyway, so they can just cruse around, ingoring orbit altogether.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There isn't if you don't have a jump drive. It's it a natural orbit, no. It's a highly modified orbit using technology we don't not have and cannot fully understand even in the books the method is not fully explained.

[–] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

KSR did something similar in 2312 where multiple small asteroids were programmed to impact at the same point same time which had the effect of a larger impact thanks to kinetics but undetectable due to being small objects of various origins that would have looked random even if detected

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, thanks for reminding me about 2312. I read that one a few years ago when I first discovered that he had written more than just the Mars Trilogy, but I should probably revisit since I sandwiched it between two of the Climate in the Capitol books and clearly I don't remember it that well.