this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
448 points (92.7% liked)

Memes

45649 readers
1573 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arc@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get where you're coming from cause you're used to F, so comparing it to C naturally keeps you thinking of F as baseline (would be the same for me the other way around). But saying that C aint on a 0-100 scale is just objectively wrong. At 0 C water freezes, at 100 C water boils. It's still a 0-100 scale, just based on something different. When it comes to metric vs imperial, it's an easy conclusion to me, when it comes to temperature I think it's more nuanced. I don't have a better explanation on the difference other than "F is human focused" while "C is science focused" (I know, doesn't quite cover it, just the best I got)

But then again, it really comes down to what you're used to feeling "right". For example, I could make similar conversions from C to F instead, and get weird numbers (water freezes at 32, and boils at 212? That makes no sense)

Never had too strong of an opinion on what temperature unit to use, but I will say this. C is a lot closer to K (kelvin) which is what is used for science, while converting F to K is a mess. So the one benefit C gives is a slightly easier time to get into that

I do need to let the nerd in me get this out too, F used to also be defined by water freezing/boiling. Meaning that technically C is a 0-100 scale, while F is a 32-212 scale. (Nowadays they're both defined by K, making this point kinda irrelevant)

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But why do I care when Water Boils at Sea level? What am I to do with that knowledge in my day to day? The 0-100 is irrelevant to me.

I'm dead long before water boils. And I'm very uncomfortable below water freezing but it won't kill me quickly.

[–] illectrility@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Fahrenheit has one advantage here: You're used to it. If you're used to Celsius, you know that 25° is warm and 5° is cold and don't give a shit about it not being a 0-100 scale for that particular use case.

The 0-100 thing is pretty much the only argument I've ever heard in favor of Fahrenheit btw. Again, if you're used to one of them, that's the one that will make the most sense.

Being used to Celsius has the advantage of automatically being used to Kelvin. For example, if you ever want to calculate anything to do with the energy required to heat something to a certain temperature, you will have a way better time with Kelvin. Being used to and measuring in Celsius helps a lot here.

But sure, I get that you're used to Fahrenheit. It's just that the whole world has decided to use Celsius. Honestly, for good reason.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

When it's snowing and freezing outside is very helpful knowledge for places where that happens. That being at zero is nice.

I'm dead long before water boils

No sauna for you I guess