this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
244 points (89.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43852 readers
671 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
immoral because he threw the chicken away?
Under my moral premises, that you may or may not agree with: he's wasting the work of other people, a potential source of food, and the life of an animal for the sake of something that could be achieved with his own hands, literally. That wastefulness is what makes it immoral for me.
Other people however might consider this immoral as it's masturbation, or because using dead flesh to do so is taboo.
I like this example however because, regardless of the reasons, there's a high chance that someone will consider it immoral. And yet even then it's hard to claim that it should be illegal.
The fuck man?