this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
248 points (94.3% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6608 readers
864 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 49 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Pretty sure the P90 is the equivalent for Stargate.

[–] nuke@yah.lol 61 points 11 months ago (3 children)

*gestures to Ma'Tok staff weapon*

This is a weapon of terror. It's made to intimidate the enemy.

*gestures to P90*

This is a weapon of war. It's made to kill your enemy.

[–] aeronmelon@lemm.ee 42 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Most brilliant moment in all of science fiction. Actual demonstration of an actual weapon mixed with meta commentary on science fiction weapons in general and how villains can't ever seem to shoot straight.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I don't know if I would say "in general", but definitely in the Stargate universe.

It doesn't make that much sense for Star Wars, but then the universe doesn't really explain a lot why, just that things are the way they are.

Star Trek seems to deploy handheld energy weapons because they provide a greater range of responses, from less than lethal to able to take out armored opponents with a single weapon.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

If you've mastered storing energy densely, energy weapons are just way better than ballistic ones. You get way more "ammo" out of the them and more flexibility as you say.

Stargate just had intentionally stupid energy weapon usage. The staffs were just bad overall, including in melee. A gun you aim by swnging it on top of your shoulder, that fires incredibly slowly and inaccurately that barely has as much punch as a 5.56 round? That you also use as an incredibly top heavy and slow bo staff? What are you idiots doing?

Meanwhile they have Zats, which are amazing, and barely use them. Rapid fire wide projective pistol grip guns that you can duel wield that instantly down your enemy in one hit, regardless of where you hit them? You have these shits on hand but all you motherfuckers are running around with cumbersome staffs?

Why Stargate command never made a zat rifle is beyond me. A P90 stock with unlimited ammo that was by default non lethal? Why the fuck are you not doing that?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I look at it like the Gou'auld has levels to their militaries, with the bulk of them being geared towards internal security. If these troops flipped, the Gou'auld could later deploy better military to take out the initial troops.

It also helped that any tactics that rebels used successfully against the first set of forces would likely fall apart against the reserve set.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

See, I dont buy it. You dont see these troops ever. You do see the Gou'auld with the bog standard Jaffa always at their side, even as their personal entourage. If they had "shock troops" or star wars style "red guards" they would have shown them in the series.

The closest is the super assassins that are occasionally invisible, but they mainly just use a knife, and are never defensive.

I think after thousands of years of just Jaffa vs Jaffa, a race of being with healing powers, their warrior culture got very ritualized and stagnate. The staff weapon is considered thr "honorable" weapon, even though its immensely stupid.

The very minute an outsider comes in with a dumb ballistic gun that shoots 900 rounds/minute, suddenly entire Jaffa squadrons of 100yr+ old warriors are getting mowed down like saturdays grass by a 4 man team consistently of 2 warriors, a warrior scientist and am archiologist that carries a 9mm.

When 9mm linguist man is whooping warriors with a centuries experience emass, yall fucked up.

[–] teft@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You dont see these troops ever. You do see the Gou’auld with the bog standard Jaffa always at their side, even as their personal entourage. If they had “shock troops” or star wars style “red guards” they would have shown them in the series.

Serpent guards are the elite of apophis. Other goa'uld have similar elite forces that guard the goa'uld. The First Prime is the foremost jaffa in the goa'uld's personal guard.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

Nevermind the US Military having magazines that fire red-laser stun rounds. We see them abundantly in one episode, and then I assume the writers agreed to pretend we didn't.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

The Federation also has deliberately unwieldy weapons, to discourage solving problems through violence. The redesigned phasers for the 1990s were so awkward that actors in combat-heavy episodes complained. That's why late-90s Trek introduced rifles.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Or how the Asgardians kind of look down on human tech as primitive and yet have to bring in humans for help because they solve problems.

Like having a weapon to kill Replicators that accelerate a metal chunk with a chemical explosion.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

you know i like to compare this to how we view the bow and arrow compared to guns

yeah the bow is primitive but it also doesn't shred your eardrums and arrows can usually be fired again, which makes it actually pretty good for hunting even to this day!

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And also, a railgun is just a bow with extra spicy string.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago

well, crossbow i'd say but a crossbow is just an improved bow so it evens out

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I love that scene so much

[–] rekabis@programming.dev 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Yeah, C4 is not exactly a ranged weapon unless it’s paired with an impact detonator and flung via trebuchet.

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Then we just strap naquadah on the C4 and blow the whole continent up. There you have your range.

[–] aeronmelon@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Yeah, C4 is not exactly a ranged weapon"

Not with that attitude it isn't.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago

Its like he's never even kissed semtex

[–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Don’t Jedi throw them all the time? Like doing spinning out boomerang moves or is that just the games?

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 months ago

Yeah it happens, but the bright light from the blade makes it clearly visible meaning that in a real battle your enemy would see where you are and kill you before your boomerang would come back to you

[–] ma11en@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you're returning blaster bolts.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A Jedi vs. a random Tau'ri with a P90 would hardly be a fair match. The Jedi wouldn't know what hit him.

[–] Gurei@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Slugthrowers are a viable weapon against jedi, old canon at least.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I've had Star Wars fans argue vigorously that a Jedi could deflect a cloud of buckshot with a lightsabre. I'm a Star Wars fan myself but that's a sure sign of someone who's gone completely off the deep end. It's a very basic question of simple geometry - you can't intercept every pellet in a three-dimensional cloud with a two-dimensional rod regardless of how fast your precognitive reflexes are.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I’d sooner accept stopping all the pellets using the force, like Neo did in the second Matrix movie.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

it's not even two dimensional, it's one dimensional!

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

Ah, brain fart, indeed.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Claymores certainly have range.