601
submitted 1 year ago by dl007@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

Thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] oce@jlai.lu 7 points 1 year ago

I disagree with this choice, but I don't think they are bullshiting, I think they are walking a difficult line of trying to be sustainable, up to date with the technology (adding 5G this early is also very questionable IMO), attractive for consumers and not completely unaffordable, which leads to difficult compromises.

[-] static_motion@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

None of those points demand the removal of the headphone jack as a compromise.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 4 points 1 year ago

Here are some: making the design easier, making reaching IP rating easier. Again, I'm not saying it would not be possible to make those with a jack, but maybe considering the aforementioned compromise, it was easier to ditch it.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
601 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

34785 readers
276 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS