this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
66 points (97.1% liked)

Games

16697 readers
805 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 18 points 11 months ago (3 children)

GameMill is such a hilariously bad publisher. How are they still in business and how do they keep getting these big franchise licenses.?

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They do what they say on the tin, pump out a dirt cheap game for your franchise. For some licence holders, that's enough.

[–] all-knight-party@kbin.run 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sometimes I think the IP holder just chooses poorly. I can't think of a walking dead game aside from telltale's that was actually good

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The VR series Saints & Sinners is decent, although stronger in the actual gameplay than the story. Although I've only played the first game.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Because people outside the industry fall into the same traps over and over again when buying contract services. It's not just game dev, it's all over the software industry.

I don't want to call these studios predatory, but they know what they are doing. They underbid the labor effort, and make sure the contract scope is vague enough that they'll get paid if something gets delivered. They know exactly how to downplay skepticism of past failures while working "the vibe" to make these deals with people who are in way over their heads.

Another big part of it is that these studios are willing to sign contracts major studios won't with regards to who owns what at the end. A major studio will want to hold back some proprietary asset pipelines, or trade secret code - for good reason. But the shovelware peddlers know they arent offering anything of such value, so they agree to sign over everything, which is a misleadingly useless value add to shovelware buyers.