115
submitted 11 months ago by FirstCircle@lemmy.ml to c/politics@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/8210190

In March, West Texas A&M University President Walter Wendler canceled a student drag show organized by several campus student clubs including members of the Secular Student Alliance.

In an email to all students, faculty, and staff, President Wendler cited his personal religious beliefs and evoked God and Creator multiple times in his justification for canceling the student event. He also falsely likened drag to blackface, claiming that the art form is misogynistic, divisive, and void of human dignity.

President Wendler’s personal religious beliefs and biblical references have no place in justifying the cancellation of the event. West Texas A&M University is a public institution and the wall of the separation of state and church remains standing.

Last week, Andrew Seidel, a constitutional lawyer and vice president of strategic communications for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, visited West Texas A&M University to give an address to support the students suing President Wendler, demonstrate that drag is not threatening, and detail the dangers of Christian Nationalism.

Andrew explained that drag shouldn’t be a concern for anyone: “Drag is art. Drag is human. Drag is beautiful.” However for religious conservatives, anything that calls into question the gender binary or the conservative Christian idea of what men ought to look like is perceived as a threat – solely because of their religious beliefs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's interesting that modern drag shows have been a thing for one hundred years without too much pearl clutching from conservatives until 2022. Gee, it's as if this is a wholly manufactured issue by the GOP to get their bigoted base riled up.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 9 points 11 months ago

Conservatives: "But I ain't never heard anybody talking about it so much before!"

Yeah, and surely that's not due to propaganda...

[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

"They kept it to themselves back then"

Conservatives are happy to "tolerate" other beliefs and ways of living provided that everyone acknowledges that they're the default, "normal" ones.

Teaching kids that there are other ways to live than as a repressed homophobe is anathema to them.

[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

It's because for all that time they could spew vitriol about and even physically harm drag queens and none of their peers batted an eye, many even joined in. Nowadays it's accepted and even popular. Conservative Christians are seeing themselves and their values become the minority and it scares the living shit out of them.

[-] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Depends on where you are talking about 1930's German "conservatives" threw quite a stink about drag shows and queer caberets right before they started raiding establishments and violently purging their own ranks of anyone whom the gossip chain cited as potentially queer.

Always remember that Hitler killed his gay bestie.

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 5 points 11 months ago

Depends on where you are talking about

Well, this is a community about U.S. politics and I’m replying to an article about Texas and specifically mentioned the GOP. Those are some pretty clear context clues.

[-] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yup, but queer and minority persecution has been tied to conservative and authoritarian politics world round over the past 100 years and it isn't even America's first go round. McCarthy's lavender scare sought to tar queer communities with the same brush as communists. Prohibition era Christian Temprance Union policies hit the queer communities by design. They used to hold police raids regularly of queer clubs which were often owned by the same criminal syndicates who were rum running. Those links ran deep. Stonewall was owned by the mob who saw the need for underground spaces to charge protection money, utilize the informants to give heads up before a raid and charge exorbitant prices just so you could slowdance in public... Other queer establishments were raided as illicit all the time because if you were caught out in the street in drag it was a crime. The Stonewall riot did not take place on the first raid. Fuck, it wasn't even the first raid that month.

Saying nobody cluched their pearls over drag shows in the past 100 years isn't exactly truthful. American history is a lot uglier than that. Whenever a country gets scared and wants to dress itself up in Christian nationalism it's meant queer persecution and genocide. America isn't particularly special in that regard.

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
115 points (94.6% liked)

politics

19051 readers
3793 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS