Technology

34862 readers

43 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

176

young voters say social media to blame for divisions in the u.s (thehill.com)

submitted 11 months ago by rob299@bookwormstory.social to c/technology@lemmy.ml

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A Quinnipiac University poll asked U.S. registered voters to select one of four options to blame for the divisions in the country. Overall, 35 percent blamed social media, 32 percent blamed political leaders, 28 percent blamed cable news channels and only 1 percent blamed other countries.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I don't know (...or care, really) about USA so I'll speak on more general grounds.

There's a lot of stuff in social media that makes it a great soapbox for social manipulation:

low cost, wide reaching: it's easy to be heard
decontextualisation: it gives more room for assumers¹ to do their shit, and make an incorrect context out of nowhere.
virality: it's easy to start a witch hunt. Cue to the pitchfork emporium / Twitter MC of the day.
upvote/like-based systems: people don't upvote your content (increasing its visibility) because you're right, they do it because you say it confidently.
on the Internet, nobody knows that you're a dog: concern trolling made easy.

Now look at what @startle@toast.ooo said: "Dunno man, seems like it might be the fascists.". IMO that user is being spot on, those five things make social media specially easy to manipulate for fascists². And they're mostly the ones creating this dichotomisation of society³, because that's how they're able to congregate the nutjobs into a political discourse. Suddenly the village idiot doesn't simply say "they're hiding aliens from us" (stupid, but morally OK), the discourse becomes "the Jews are hiding aliens from us" (stupid and Antisemitic).

By "assumers" I mean individuals who are quick to draw conclusions based on little to no reasoning, evidence, or thought. This plague exists since the dawn of time, it's just that decontextualisation gives them more room to assume shit out of nowhere.
Fascists often babble about "virtue signalling", without realising that themselves are prone to signal adherence to their stupid beliefs. They don't want to be in the receiving end of their own witch hunts.
By "society" I mean at the very least Western Europe plus the Americas; probably more. It is not exclusive to USA.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

To expand more on virality: Platform algorithms reward posts that get engagement because it sells ad space. Posts that trigger our lizard brain get engagement.