this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
2640 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59577 readers
3576 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fosho@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it's pretty inconclusive if there's no context for how that code is called. I'm kinda confused why the article wouldn't have provided any additional detail other than a single line of code. why bother digging at all?

[–] _thisdot@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

it's part of their anti-adblock code. without going into too much details, they can instantly find out whether ad-block is trying to do anything on chrome, but on firefox they need a 5 sec delay

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Which is honestly to Firefox's credit. Making it harder to find out stuff about your browser is a good thing, unless it has to do with feature support.

But the fact that they don't give a shit and are willing to ruin the user experience for it, that's despicable.

[–] DolphinMath@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

I’d be more likely to believe that if spoofing your user agent didn’t immediately fix the issue.