283
submitted 11 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LWD@lemm.ee 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] teft@startrek.website 111 points 11 months ago

Switching to what? Firefox. I don’t see the problem here. Install Firefox and forget those monopolistic enshitifying fucks.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

I went from Netscape to Mozzila and from Mozilla to Firefox and, guess what... my browser never fucked me up in the name of maximizing corporate profits.

Google was already a wholly untrustworth Ad Company With A Tech Arm back when they invented Chrome, and shit like this was already back then a question of WHEN, not IF.

[-] Teknikal@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago

My recommendation is librefox and if you really want a chrome based alternative I'd suggest Thorium (although I don't know what thorium will do when this is implemented I'm hoping they don't follow it.)

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

For anyone interested, as of November 2023:

Web browsers using Gecko (Firefox's engine): GNU IceCat, Waterfox, K-Meleon, Lunascape, Portable Firefox, Conkeror, Classilla, TenFourFox. Edit: and Fennec

Web browsers using the Goanna engine (which is a fork of Gecko): Pale Moon, Basilisk.

Flow is a web browser with its own proprietary browser engine.

The other active engines listed are: WebKit (Apple's engine), and Blink (Google's engine, which they forked off of WebKit, and which is used for Chrome, Chromium, and countless other browsers).

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

I'd no idea there's a browser called Conkeror. That's prertty funny since WebKit was based off of KHTML used in KDE's Konqueror browser.

[-] viking@infosec.pub 6 points 11 months ago
[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 11 months ago
[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 11 months ago

I use firefox, but Id never head of these alternatives.

Anyone who does have reviews? Pros, cons, reasons to use them beside variety?

[-] krakenx@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Pale Moon still supports the even older extension model. I used it briefly until my extensions got updated to the newer format. I still kinda miss the old theme engine.

[-] Blorper59@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago

I thought it was pronounced Kay Melly-on, so I never tried it because of the silly name.

Pihole will be unaffected.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 11 months ago

Every other Google Chromium fork will need to maintain an increasingly complex set of changes to the Google repository

Yet infinitely easier than building a new browser from the bottom up

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl -4 points 11 months ago

I hear people say Chromium is bad for the web all the time but they all seem to think that Chromium = Chrome.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 11 months ago

Okay, would you like to elaborate beyond what I just said?

[-] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Because using Chromium and Chromium-based browsers reinforces Chrome's market share dominance which will harm comparability as more and more sites will only be tested against Chrome and in many cases refuse to serve pages to other browsers without user agent string fuckery.

It also cultivates dependence on Google for the extension ecosystem, etc

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Chromium source code is still controlled and gatekeept by Google

What? Chromium is open source. That's how Chromium-based browsers even exist.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 11 months ago

I see the disconnect now. You're mistaking "open source" for 'inherently good."

Uhhhh no you don't see anything. I didn't say anything like that.

the forks either have to either maintain an increasingly complex list of patches to apply to fix what Google does to Chromium (the browser that runs two thirds of the web) or simply accept it.

And they do the former.

So I ask again, what's the problem?

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 11 months ago

Yes, you did. In your first comment in this thread.

If you're just going to blatantly and plainly lie about what I said, where everyone can see it, I'm not going to continue engaging with you. Bye now 👋

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 11 months ago

Which in no way resembles "open source is inherently good", but thank you for reading my comments back to me.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
283 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

59137 readers
2139 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS