Asklemmy

43940 readers

793 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

156

What is something that definitely should not exist? (endlesstalk.org)

submitted 1 year ago by ani@endlesstalk.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

218 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, the 4th was a sequel to deliberately end all future sequels.

[–] kuneho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I understand that, but this reasoning as well don't really help on it at all. ruining something nice because "fuck you all" is just... I don't even know.

edit: I think Matrix could have been a great series, even with something main plot that the 4th one had. or a cartoon. I know lot of frenchise went downhill after taking this path, but it's something that would have fit nicely with Matrix.