this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
85 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59329 readers
6303 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
85
Court: Cloudflare is Liable for Pirate Site, But Not as a DNS Provider (torrentfreak.com)
submitted 11 months ago by silverbax@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Poutinetown@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Does the verdict mention anything about the DNS service itself (buying a website through cloudflare and setting up records)? Or is it just concerning the public DNS resolver (1.1.1.1?)

[–] marius851000@lemmy.mariusdavid.fr 10 points 11 months ago

This article clearly is just about the public DNS resolver. Using cloudflare to register a domain is well different, in particular cause it’ll play a “significant” role to make it accessible. (as 1. it is not neutral (you need to be a customer) and 2. Removing a registration will block it for everyone).