what about the number whose square is -1
Roses are red, Euhler's a hero, e^iπ+1=0
You're just imagining it
Someone needs to hit you with a dose of reality
as far as the rationals are concerned, this is the same as the number whose square is 2. (ℚ(i) and ℚ(√2) are isomorphic as fields.)
what we can gleam from this is that complete rationality can blur the line between what’s real and what’s imaginary
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
what about the number whose square is -1
Roses are red, Euhler's a hero, e^iπ+1=0
You're just imagining it
Someone needs to hit you with a dose of reality
as far as the rationals are concerned, this is the same as the number whose square is 2. (ℚ(i) and ℚ(√2) are isomorphic as fields.)
what we can gleam from this is that complete rationality can blur the line between what’s real and what’s imaginary