76
submitted 1 year ago by Pips@lemmy.film to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ooops@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

The problem is that it's always depending on the dose.

Fictional example: You can show an increased cancer risk in animal testing if amount x is consumed regularly. But then X is also the equivalent to 20% your body weight in sugar per day.

So now you don't just suspect it's carcinogenic, you know. But it's still completely irrelevant when used as an ingredient in food obviously.

That's basically like saying we need more studies on the toxicity of water as we know it is indeed toxic if you consume too much.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
76 points (94.2% liked)

World News

32088 readers
908 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS