this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
69 points (90.6% liked)

Nintendo

18560 readers
2 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date


|


Donkey Kong Country Returns HD | Jan 16, 2025 Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20, 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think we all know that patents don't usually mean anything and aren't an indicator of a product actually coming to launch, but what do you all think of a potentially smaller, more portable Switch?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can see them diverging again with a beefy next get one (aka switch 2), but then also introducing a nano switch. The only issue I think is if they are both introduced at the same time and only the switch 2 can play switch 2 games (and is backwards compatible) and the nano could only play switch 1 games, then consumers will be confused.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Will that be confusing? Nintendo released the Game Boy Micro (only plays Game Boy Advance cartridges) after the DS (DS and GBA cartridges). I don't think too many people were confused.

To avoid confusion, Nintendo should name their next system something other than Switch 2, Switch Next, or something else with Switch in the name. Then again, I cannot understand the Xbox naming convention is a bit nonsense but no one is out rioting in the streets.

[–] SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The New Switch U XL

[–] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve never really cared about Xbox, and tbh I don’t even understand what the newest one is supposed to be called anymore. They really “Wii U’d” hard with the last few names.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Took me a while to understand the difference between all the recent Xboxes. I hate their naming scheme!

Xbox One = base unit, released in 2013. Equivalent to PS4.

Xbox One X = mid-gen upgrade, released in 2017. Equivalent to PS4 Pro.

Xbox Series S = lower-tier current-gen console, released in 2020. No PS equivalent.

Xbox Series X = higher-tier current-gen console, released in 2020 alongside the Series S. Equivalent to PS5.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even people that have one of these can't tell me which it is

[–] CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Switch 2 is a clear sign to consumers that it's not a Switch, which is the issue they had with the WiiU. I think Nintendo will be too scared to risk a repeat of that honestly. I could see a Nano getting a name like Switch Pocket or something similar. But Switch Next is a bigger risk

[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, please no. They should stick with just one. They don't have enough output to split into two consoles.

Sorry, the best they can do is a New Super Switch U Nano 2/3DS