641

Grand Theft Auto VI Trailer 1 (www.youtube.com)

submitted 9 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/games@lemmy.world

270 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

RDR2 was still phenomenal after getting the GTAO money. Rockstar can still make great single-player content when they want to.

[-] Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network 2 points 9 months ago

I agree. It's just that this is the same series.. Idk maybe it will kick ass, I'm just overly cynical I guess lol

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

My expectation is that it will be very good, but will have no single player DLC whatsoever in lieu of GTAO2 or whatever they call it. And no, I've never forgiven them for doing that with V. At least this time I won't be expecting it.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

What if it doesn't need DLC? When the concept of DLC first came out, everyone complained that devs were just releasing unfinished games and that you were obligated to buy DLC to enjoy a full experience. Now people only buy games because they're expecting DLC?

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Because Rockstar did some good DLC for GTA IV and Red Dead Redemption. I agree that DLC isn't a good thing if it's carved out of the base game, but Rockstar had a good track record of making good DLC for already feature-complete games.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Unnecessarily cynical. The same series? Are Vice City, SA, and 4 considered bad games?

[-] Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network 1 points 9 months ago

Did you even read my initial comment?

I explicitly said that I have never been let down by a GTA campaign. What I was saying was that RDR2 is a different series that plays by different rules. For that reason I don't feel like it's necessarily fair to use RDR2 as an example of how they will treat GTA with the respect the series deserves.