Technology

59636 readers

2695 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

689

Tesla whistleblower calls cars with Autopilot “experiments in public roads” (arstechnica.com)

submitted 11 months ago by DannyMac@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

78 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The ignorance on display here is palpable.

Agreed.

How convenient, you avoided answering my question at all!

Why do you hate children?

that has directly caused 17 fatalities, mind you

[citation needed]

It's all garbage if it poses a threat to a human life.

It doesn't. It's the opposite. It protects human life.

dismissing results due to your own biases is quite ignorant.

How can I "dismiss results" when none have been presented?

[+] nicolascage@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

My CompE Master's and my previous work in vision-based AI collision detection systems has left me woefully unprepared to have educated and qualified experience for this exact topic.

That's awesome! Would you share more with us about the research you conducted with Tesla's AutoPilot, and specifically what makes it "experimental"?

I never mentioned children

How convenient, you avoided answering the question at all!

Here you go:

As I suspected, nothing points to the notion that this was caused by AutoPilot. It's caused by inattentive drivers.

This is nothing but shit "journalism" playing on whatever is "hot" and trendy.

I'm sure the 17+ dead human lives really appreciate this "protection".

There are no dead human lives. You're just making that up.

dismissing the findings of engineers close to the technology due to your own biases is incredibly ignorant.

I don't have any biases. "Ignorant" is claiming that a driver assistance system is responsible for driver inattentiveness.

Bye bye now.

[+] nicolascage@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hey welcome back!

Why the accidents happen is not why I commented.

That's literally the entire point of the article in OP. You repeatedly blamed Autopilot for several deaths. If that's not the point, what is?

Says the person that literally drives a Tesla with Autopilot

That doesn't inherently make me biased. I can and will gladly talk shit about all the dumb shit Tesla does. There's plenty of it to go around without fabricating nonsense.

You've favored your own 10k+ miles over an ex-Tesla employee and refuse to accept reported data

You keep repeating this and I keep correcting you. I'm not doing it again. I've been abundantly clear about this several times at this point. That's not what's happening. If you want to argue with a strawman, feel free to do that with yourself.

Your ignorance is due to you believing your personal anecdotal evidence is qualified in any way to dismiss Autopilot issues as an experiment.

It absolutely is. It doesn't require anything more. That's just a fact.