836
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

The qualification for being a Christian is that you believe in Christ. That is literally it. You can be the worst person ever and be a Christian.

In fact, most Christians believe that everyone is a sinner, so being horrible is basically expected and accepted. You just need to repent eventually.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

The qualification for being a Christian is that you believe in Christ. That is literally it.

No, the qualification for being a Christian is that you follow Christ. The Biblical writer James actually addresses this very thing ad absurdum by showing that, if the qualification is only to believe in Jesus, even the demons are Christians. Repentance is the first act of selecting into the group of "Christian."

You can be the worst person ever and be a Christian.

No, you can have been the worst person ever and be a Christian. Repentance begins the journey and remains a constant throughout; as Martin Luther said in the first of his 95 Theses, "When our Lord and Master Jesus Christ said, 'Repent,' he willed the entire life of believers to be one of repentance."

In fact, most Christians believe that everyone is a sinner, so being horrible is basically expected and accepted.

I'm so sorry that you've been given such a twisted view of this, though I totally understand why (I've seen this argument being made, particularly about Trump in 2016). Being horrible is explicitly not expected or accepted; Jesus himself causes people who claim faith but do awful things "vipers" and weaves a whip to use on them to prove he's serious. The biblical writer Paul asks rhetorically, "shall I continue sinning so that grace may abound? God forbid!" And theologian after theologian for 2,000 years has said the same. If you're gleefully continuing in being horrible, you're proving that you aren't a Christian; and Christians since the first century have affirmed that definition of the faith.

[-] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Finally... someone who knows what the fuck they're talking about around here. It's so refreshing to see someone who is actually familiar with the texts in question and the historicity of these claims.

It's people like you that keep me wading through all this sewage and garbage.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I appreciate your kind words.

[-] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago

No, being horrible is not expected or accepted. The Puritans (read: Evangelicals) like to interpret it that way, and in fact they do that because it absolves them of personal responsibility. "Well, I don't do that one really terrible thing, therefore I can feel secure and not worry about my behavior."

In reality, sin just means error, imperfection. It's an acknowledgement that no human can be perfect the way that God is perfect, no matter what. The correct response to this should be ongoing self-evaluation, humility, and caution against slipping into the many easy faults of humanity. We should all be repenting constantly because obviously we make mistakes all the time, and all we can do is keep trying to be better, do better. This is what you find in classical literature like Thomas Kempis's The Imitation of Christ.

If you see someone (and I know this is common) running around claiming absolute security in their righteousness with God, then you're seeing a person who is quite literally actively sinning.

The knock on effect of this whole situation is that Christians who don't believe they know all and speak for God (another sin: taking the Lord's name in vain) don't get public attention because we don't run around shouting at people about our religious beliefs.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It’s an acknowledgement that no human can be perfect the way that God is perfect, no matter what.

Does the scriptures speak towards why God is perfect, and why we're imperfect?

Specifically, if we're made in God's image, then doesn't that mean God is not perfect either, or that we were purposely made imperfectly?

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Does the scriptures speak towards why God is perfect, and why we're imperfect?

This is a close cousin to the problem of pain. Many smarter people than I have debated both around and around for centuries, and come no nearer an answer than when they started. The Bible gives us a how, and a who, but not a why. Honestly I wish there was more, but alas.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

A well written response, thank you.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Thank you. I wish I had more, but I won't pretend like I have answers I don't.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

but I won’t pretend like I have answers I don’t.

Truth, above all.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

And who created this definition that you're referencing? You speak as if it's the authority on what is and isn't Christian.

[-] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago

I'm not debating. Just sharing what I've been taught.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago

Ah, well, you were taught that by non-christians.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Kempis is a very storied and well-respected theologian from right before the Reformation. He's looked upon fondly by the Anglicans, Methodists, and Jesuits alike. He's about as Christian as they come, and the fruit of his belief is abundant.

[-] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 3 points 11 months ago

Thomas Kempis is very much Christian. There are a variety of Christian authors in this vein. Modern American Evangelicalism doesn't comprise the entirety of religious thinking.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago

They're Christian according to whom? To them?

No, they're not Christian at all.

[-] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago

Again, I'm not debating. But I do find the irony interesting.

And who created this definition that you're referencing? You speak as if it's the authority on what is and isn't Christian.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

I feel like you're missing the irony..

You cannot say who is or isn't Christian any more than I can. Just because you reference those YOU see as an authority didn't make you correct. It simply moves the problem one step to the left. Those people also can't say who is or isn't Christian.

There is no metric by which you can measure who is a Christian. At best you can say that some people don't act as you would expect Christians to act. But that's just your option, and says more about your beliefs than them.

[-] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 3 points 11 months ago

No, they're not Christians at all.

I'm just pointing out that you're not being consistent.

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
836 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4701 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS