1119
submitted 9 months ago by Sibbo@sopuli.xyz to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aksdb@feddit.de 51 points 9 months ago

There's nothing wrong with UDP. At least not that I know of.

[-] You999@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago
[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago
[-] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

You are unstoppable!

[-] konalt@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago
[-] lud@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

Not my problem.

[-] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Not really a problem with UDP itself, but with some very old protocols like DNS that rely on UDP but can’t be changed because of compatibility. If you’re writing a new service that uses UDP, there’s nothing stopping you from designing it so that it doesn’t provide an opportunity for bandwidth amplification.

[-] PreviouslyAmused@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

It’s technically not a bug if it’s operating as intended

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
1119 points (98.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

32050 readers
1715 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS