Academia

767 readers

3 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Sal@mander.xyz

Surge in number of ‘extremely productive’ authors concerns scientists (www.nature.com)

submitted 11 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/academia@mander.xyz

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] inspxtr@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

anyone care to shed light on how physics authorship practices differ from the others that results in its exclusion?

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

It's all pretend with physics.

Jk don't

[–] swicano@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Agreed, I was a bit confused as to why all of physics is such a blatant outlier. Maybe big experimental physics (e.g. LHC) with their 150+ author papers?

[–] inspxtr@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

yeah but there are so many types of physics, theoretical and experimental, as well as physics that blend into other fields. Seems like a big field to leave out?

regardless, my guess is one could easily control for author sizes of team science papers, or filter them out for separate analyses.

maybe there’s some special authorship culture in physics that warrants this.