Asklemmy

43852 readers

1735 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What would you call a monarchist government where multiple families rules in turns? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by vis4valentine@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm making a fantasy novel. In this one there is a monarchy system, where 4 families rule in turns. After the current monarch dies, the next family in the circle most present an heir from their family to ruse the nation until they die and then the next family takes the throne.

What would you call this government model? Oligarchic monarchy? Poli-Monarchy? Help me with some suggestions. I'm also not sure if this has happened in the history, I can't find anything about it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] vis4valentine@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

coming to this arangemen–and maintaining it in perpetuity–must have been an extremely extrordinary set of circumstances.

It was. I don't want to spoil my own lore, but this is the solution they found to prevent mutual extermination through civil wars.

[–] s_s@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is the monarch required to be sacrificed or put in harms was every so often?

That would kinda mimic the Aztec Festival of Toxcatl, where an impersonator of the god Tezcatlipoca was sacrificed every year after being treated like a god for the year. The god-man was usually selected from royal families. He had religous function and was provided for in specific ways (eg a harem) but he wasn't a monarch.

[–] vis4valentine@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

No, there is no human sacrifice (in that specific nation at least). But it is an organized imperialistic-spartan-like society and need to keep peace inside the borders at all cost.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

You may want to read up about the Roman Empire's experiment with tetrarchy (rule by four emperors), which was in part an attempt to prevent civil wars.