this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
923 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

60082 readers
3315 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure he was paying - the deletion email mentions that his subscription would be cancelled.

[–] Dempf@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah he was probably paying like $10/mo for a really basic GSuite organization with unlimited data. I know because I did that for a few years with some TBs of backups. When I first set the account up, I knew with certainty that Google would eventually cut me off because yeah that kind of service is worth way more than $10/mo in reality.

I've been getting emails for months saying I'm over the limit. I can't remember if they ever said specifically they would delete my data because I stopped paying for it before it got to that point. Kind of crazy IMHO to assume Google will store so many TBs forever for only $10/mo. Still, would be real nice of them to give this guy a little more time to download his data.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not ridiculous when that's the service they offered. The courts should honestly stick them to their word (small companies have been driven out of business for much less) but we all know that's not happening in a corporatocracy like this.

[–] Dempf@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

True. To be fair, I believe the original terms required you pay for a minimum of 5 employees (so $50/mo). No great love for Google here, and I would love to see the courts make them honor something like this if they did indeed advertise falsely.

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, that's my main issue - having a 1 week deadline for deletion sprung on you when it's not physically possible to extricate the data in that timespan is rough.

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re right, that’s a paid plan. I guess my point was more that you need to look out for your own interests a bit. If his storage has been read-only for the past 6 months then that would be a strong clue to do something about it.

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably, but A) dude literally had his hardware yoinked by the cops and B) there was no reasonable schedule shared with the user re: data deletion.

I wish googles "read only" notification said "we will delete your data after 3 months of read-only status", just to allow folks to properly plan. If you told me the only penalty was my data will be read only, and kept accepting my money, I would assume everything is okay.