Constructed Languages

3 readers

1 users here now

A community for discussing constructed languages (conlangs) and the process of creating one yourself!

founded 1 year ago

What's something interesting about your conlang? (kbin.social)

submitted 11 months ago by ThatOneKirbyMain2568@kbin.social to c/conlangs@kbin.social

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Pretty much what the title says. What's a feature in your conlang that you find especially cool?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ThatOneKirbyMain2568@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Something neat about my conlang, Hip'alŭk', is how it handles demonstratives (e.g., "this" & "that"). Demonstratives have both a three-way distinction between persons (speaker, addressee, and both) and a three-way distinction between distances (near, slightly far, and far).

This results in 9 different demonstratives (that I haven't nailed down words for yet):

meoproximal DEM.PROX.1 — “this near me”
tuoproximal DEM.PROX.2 — “that near you”
omniproximal DEM.PROX.1+2 — “that near us both”
meomesial DEM.MES.1 — “that slightly far from me”
tuomesial DEM.MES.1 — “that slightly far from you”
omnimesial DEM.MES.1+2 — “that slightly far from us both”
meodistal DEM.DIST.1 — “that far from me”
tuodistal DEM.DIST.2 — “that far from you”
omnidistal DEM.DIST.1+2 — “that far from us both”

[–] Xoriff@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. Could you combine them? As in, could you use this system to really simply say like "this far-me near-you book"?

[–] ThatOneKirbyMain2568@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Hmm, I imagine you wouldn't need to. For your example, just using the tuoproximal demonstrative (i.e., that near-you book) would imply that the book is far away from the speaker — otherwise, they would've used the omniproximal. I could see two being used for emphasis though.