this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
37 points (97.4% liked)

PC Master Race

14955 readers
2 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.

Notes:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world
_MoveSwiftly@lemmy.world
Xeon@lemmy.ml
IowaMan@lemmy.world
The_Vampire@lemmy.world
CatZoomies@lemmy.world
geosoco@kbin.social
Fudgeknuckles98@lemmy.world
BobaFett26@lemmy.world
37
Does overclocking negatively affect the GPU at in any way if it doesn't reach the thermal limit at all? (lemmy.world)
submitted 11 months ago by 0Xero0@lemmy.world to c/pcmasterrace@lemmy.world
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I overlock my Gigabyte RTX 3060 12GB OC with MSI Afterburner, with Mem at +550, Core at +55, Voltage at 100%, temp limit at 90C and power limit at 124 (which are the highest possible for temp and power). I stress tested it with FurMark for over 30 minutes and the highest temp I've got is like 67-68C, on very rare occasions it reaches 69 (nice), I got a 70 once and never reach it again. I've read that overclocking reduces the GPU lifespan since it causes more stress and high temp. But mine is no where close to thermal limit so I wonder if overclocking is harmful to the card if the temp is below the thermal limit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Presi300@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I personally wouldn't bother, as the 5-ish % performance gain isn't worth the extra power consumption, noise and potential instability...