this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
478 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

69865 readers
2928 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is the room relevant here? Is it not a grave invasion of privacy regardless in which room of the house it was? What even is your point, that if the camera had been in the living room instead... then what?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The room is extremely relevant. The activities that happen on your patio, in your living room, are different than the activities that happen in your bedroom. Some of those activities are more sensitive than others

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you would be ok with your livingroom being watched 24/7 by unknown people?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 year ago

Not at all. But there would be less sensitive material to be observed in that instance. Just because there's different severities, doesn't mean anything except the ultimate severity is acceptable.