this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
190 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59404 readers
2082 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Families of Buffalo massacre victims sue Meta, Reddit, and Google over conspiracy theories::The lawsuit seeks changes to the changes companies’ safety standards, with the plaintiffs calling the platforms “defective and unreasonably dangerous.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This seems unlikely to succeed. "He wouldn't have killed those people if he hadn't read that book with those weird ideas in it!" is unlikely to ever justify finding the publisher of that book liable, under plain First Amendment jurisprudence.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whats next, suing video games companies for making video games?

[–] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Blame them for violent protests sparked by your shitty policy decisions

[–] c0c0c0@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And yet, somehow, I feel like the lawyers who took this unwinnable case are going to come out okay.

[–] Methylman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

One of life's truisms: everyone can lose except the lawyers involved

[–] Methylman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure that's the best analogy since publishers do have an onus not to publish certain materials (example How would that work out for someone publishing something like the anarchists cookbook?)

Conversely, its not considered feasible for content providers (who don't generate or police the content BEFORE it's public) to police the work of content generators (the users). That's why s.230 of the CDA (imo) does more than the first amendment

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

https://www.amazon.com/s?k=the+anarchists+cookbook

It's openly sold by the world's biggest bookstore. (And so are the similarly-named books that are actual cookbooks ...)

[–] Methylman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Oh is it not banned anymore? Then my bad for using that as an example, but publishers do censor the works of their authors to try and avoid liability