this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
135 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

59223 readers
3781 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
135
WhatsApp continues working on Instagram integration behind closed doors (www.androidpolice.com)
submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alxe@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It seems that Meta is low-key following the "everything app" goal that Elon Musk wanted for Twitter/X, tying products like WhatsApp, Instagram, Threads while at the same time distancing themselves from the Facebook brand.

For example, WhatsApp is a chat app that has been enhanced to have Business Accounts, which allows for Bots, Stores and Payments. Further integration with Instagram could potentially use these features to tie together content+business. Threads is an enhancement over Instagram to add textual content.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They really want to be WeChat

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

It'll never catch on in the US, though. We don't need the functionality that an "everything app" like WeChat would provide. WeChat took off because it filled in a big gap for its users. The US already has a robust and diversified financial market and payments infrastructure that Zuck won't have any chance of breaking into.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Still, becoming the US "WeChat" is a very wet dream for any corporation. Of course they will try.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The US already has a robust and diversified financial market and payments infrastructure

I heard that you folks up north still send written cheques via mail and sign little papers when use a credit card, doesn't sound very robust or diversified to me

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Valid, but our credit card and mobile payment penetration is way higher than China's was at the time WeChat launched, and bank relationships are notoriously sticky.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago

WeChat took off because it filled in a big gap for its users.

No it took off because the CCP banned everything else

[–] capy_bara@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I was already unhappy when businesses started offering WhatsApp as a contact option.... It's only getting worse

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Don’t fucking credit phony stark when talking about his everything app that doesn’t exist. Meanwhile China actually has such things, such as WeChat

Elon was simply trying to copy that model