Note: Piracy is not an answer. I understand why, and do agree to a certain extent... But sometimes, the happiness gained by playing something from a legitimate source is far greater 🥹... coming from someone who could never ever afford to purchase games, nor could my parents... Hence I've always played bootleg, or pirated games.

TL;DR

What's wrong?

Their launcher has a terrible UI AND UX.
They make exclusive deals with studios to prevent other platforms from getting games. (Someone mentioned that Steam did the same thing in their infancy. Also, I have another question; why is it ok for Sony and Microsoft to make exclusive games for their consoles but not ok for these PC platforms to do so?)
They have been invested in by a Chinese company, Tencent. (Someone mentioned that it isn't that big of a deal, but idk.)
They are actively anti-linux for some reason.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even worse is that they do this while trying to paint themselves as the underdog against the Steam monopoly. It's not only hypocritical, but also deceitful. A new monopoly is not a solution to an existing monopoly, but a solution to investments paying off.

[–] Killer@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Don't forget them being hypocritical again for suing google/apple for being monopolistic because they don't want to have to go through them for payment.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You guys don't understand what a monopoly is...

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I do know what it is, and I don't actually think Steam is one. They have a considerable market share, but they are by no means the only way to get games on PC, nor do they exercise their dominance in a way that stifles competition.

I'm pretty sure Tim Sweeny knows this as well, but he still calls it a "monopoly" whenever he has the chance.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -2 points 10 months ago

They were sued in the EU for violating anti trust laws, lost and decided not to cooperate.

They're currently getting sued for forcing devs to not sell their games at a lower price on other platforms.

Their marketshare is more than enough to consider them a monopoly, you don't need 100% of the market to be one, you just need to be so implanted that you become the default solution. Google doesn't have 100% of the market, it still is considered a monopoly for search engines