122
US Claims Huge Chunk of Seabed Amid Strategic Push for Resources
(www.bnnbloomberg.ca)
News from around the world!
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
One of these claims is compatible with UNCLOS, the other absolutely is not. The US pulls plenty of international dickery, including not ratifying UNCLOS, but this claim fits within that existing international law just fine
Except it's not really compatible with UNCLOS.
The US interpretation of UNCLOS would allow them to claim like half the Pacific
What do you think isn't in line with it? This isn't an exclusive economic zone claim.
Part XI
There are 58 articles in part XI. Which ones are you talking about?