this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
228 points (91.6% liked)

News

23367 readers
2676 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If you’re thinking of sending back a disappointing gift you just received over the holidays, the return may bring even more disappointment.

Americans have grown accustomed to free returns, but a growing number of retailers are charging fees as returns squeeze retailers’ bottom lines.

Macy’s, Abercrombie, J. Crew, H&M and other companies have all added shipping fees for mail-in returns.

And it’s not just the big mall brands, either. Eighty-one precent of merchants are now charging a fee for at least some methods of returns, according to Happy Returns, a logistics company that specializes in returns.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BaldProphet@kbin.social 27 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Shipping fees for returns isn't too bad, but if it looks like a retailer isn't standing behind the products they sell them they shouldn't be surprised when shoppers shop elsewhere.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

The issue is that it's become too easy to buy a garment in 5 sizes and just return the ones that don't fit. Many of those returned garments don't get restocked, but instead end up selling downmarket where they can often end up in landfill. It wastes fuel, the retailer's money, and harms the environment.

I think there should be some consequence for return. Even just a few dollars. Maybe find a better way to size things accurately so people don't have to be so cautious.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 33 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If clothing manufacturers made clothes anywhere near standard sizes people wouldn't need to get 5 different sizes to figure out what the hell a Large is supposed to be.

[–] guyrocket@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

In general I avoid buying clothes online. And I will avoid it much more if returns are difficult.

[–] stevehobbes@lemy.lol 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I mean sure, but everyone’s bodies are different. What drives me nuts is quality control. You can pick up 10 pairs of Levi’s that are 34x30 and each one will be different by probably over an inch. I have resorted to taking several identical pairs to the dressing room and keeping the one that fit the best.

Then everyone’s bodies are different. Some clothes will be cut differently and then fit differently. Basically, clothes shopping if you can’t get a few sizes online (or a few of the same sizes…) sucks.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

No. I won't buy clothing that doesn't have a no argument return policy. Way too many times in my life the clothing died after only wearing once. You go shop at your store that likes "consequences". I am going to laugh so hard when I see the handwritten note on the door that ends up on the internet

[–] Copernican@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How often are returns defective vs just didn't want/didn't fit? If the item is defective you can't restock it. If the item isn't defective that's where more cost might come in to get the item back in circulation to be sold.

[–] ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

We're talking about clothes here. I have never been able to find any clothing items that were consistently and accurately sized. Often even across the same brands, sizing is consistently inconsistent. If I can't return for the proper size once I get an example of a product's fit and sizing without paying for it, then the convenience of online shopping has evaporated and I might as well just go into a store and try things on. As if they don't already charge enough of a markup to cover restocking.