512
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A 14-year-old boy allegedly fatally shot his older sister in Florida after a family argument over Christmas presents, officials said Tuesday.

The teen had been out shopping on Christmas Eve with Abrielle Baldwin, his 23-year-old sister, as well as his mother, 15-year-old brother and sister's children, Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri said during a news conference.

The teenage brothers got into an argument about who was getting more Christmas presents.

"They had this family spat about who was getting what and what money was being spent on who, and they were having this big thing going on in this store," Gualtieri said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Strict liability for whoever was the legal owner of the gun(s), I say.

Whoever let these children get their hands on the firearm is absolutely a murderer. Even if it someone who let their gun get stolen from their car. Definitely if it was a family member or friend.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -1 points 8 months ago

Oh, I remember that event with an actor killing a camera operator with a prop gun (jokingly pointing it at her) or something.

The person responsible for props was a complete dumb baboon and guilty of murder, yes.

However, I was shocked by the fact that so many people think that pointing a real gun, even if it's a prop, at somebody without checking that it's not loaded is normal and thus that actor was innocent. They were defending that action as if they themselves would really have taken a gun and squeezed the trigger while pointing at someone without checking.

So maybe it's about responsibility and education, not ownership of guns.

Because, say, Moldova (off the top of my mind), hardly a rich country or even with a healthy society, has gun laws more liberal than in USA, and doesn't have school shootings and such events.

Switzerland and Austria have very liberal gun laws, again possibly more so than in USA, and don't have such a problem.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 16 points 8 months ago

Can't speak for Moldova or Austria, but I would not call Switzerland's gun laws liberal.

They are VERY strict. Gun ownership rates are high, but there are tons of restrictions and licensing requirements on ownership and sale of guns there. The country is proof that having a strong regulatory structure does not necessarily prevent gun ownership and should absolutely be considered a model for where the US regulator environment should be moving (universal registration including 2nd hand sales, full license checks for all purchases including ammo, effective bans on large categories of weapons, mandatory training, and the like).

People who love "gun rights" always cite Switzerland without even doing the most basic Wikipedia-level research on it.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 months ago

People who love “gun rights” always cite Switzerland without even doing the most basic Wikipedia-level research on it.

People winning arguments in their heads shouldn't come to real ones.

[-] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

and Austria have very liberal gun laws, again possibly more so than in USA,

Austria has relatively relaxed gun laws for Europe. but it's still fairly strict compared to the USA.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago

Oh, OK, OK. I've literally had something in my memory and did only quick reading on laws in those 2 countries before writing that comment, and evaluated strictness on my own.

[-] hpca01@programming.dev 4 points 8 months ago

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't those places where you're required to take some kind of classes to be able to qualify to own a gun? Isn't it also pretty easy for anyone from the police to be able to take them from you within reason if they find you to be violating some laws?

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah. If "taking some kind of classes" is not obligatory in the US, then we have the main reason for all the accidental shootings and kids takings their parents' guns right here.

[-] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

You can't put the responsibility on the actor who never chose to own a gun, so they have no reason to educate themselves about gun safety.
All responsibility lies with their employer (I guess that's the producer and/or director), who made them handle a gun as part of their job and should have given them the required training, as well as the prop guy whose job it was to check the gun.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago

on the actor who never chose to own a gun, so they have no reason to educate themselves about gun safety.

He chose to take it, point it at a person and squeeze the trigger, so yes he had that reason and yes I can.

Jokingly, I should add, he wasn't instructed by anyone to take that gun and wave it around.

The only people not having a reason to educate themselves about gun safety are people who don't touch guns.

All responsibility lies with their employer (I guess that’s the producer and/or director), who made them handle a gun as part of their job and should have given them the required training,

Yeah, they probably managed to make only the prop guy responsible too, just like that actor. But I don't remember the details.

as well as the prop guy whose job it was to check the gun.

... and about that person I've already said what I wanted.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world -3 points 8 months ago

Even if it someone who let their gun get stolen from their car.

No.

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
512 points (97.2% liked)

News

22882 readers
4031 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS