Technology

59223 readers

3179 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

303

2023 was the year that GPUs stood still (arstechnica.com)

submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

87 comments fedilink hide all child comments

2023 was the year that GPUs stood still::A new GPU generation did very little to change the speed you get for your money.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] filister@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Especially now when gaming GPUs are an afterthought for them.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thats only nvidia though. Amd seems to still be trying to compete with nvidia some way or another

[–] filister@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I wouldn't say so, they also seem to have abandoned the gaming segment and nowadays are playing more or less ball with NVIDIA while trying to improve their AI stack so that they can get a higher chunk of the data centre business.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't think that's true at all. Let's go back a while.

We had Polaris, a mid range 2016 architecture that was sold for years as a mid range then low end card.

They also had the Vega cards, which were compute-focussed and not particularly great at gaming.

Following that, they had the 5700 series. Decent gaming cards.

After that, the 6000s series. Right up there with Nvidia, and taking into consideration the die size, performance, and comparatively generous VRAM, you could argue they were the better gaming cards, despite losing in RT.

7000s series is pretty much like the 6000 except slightly further behind the 4090, albeit for half the real-world price due to AI demand bringing the already crazy 4090 prices even higher.

Idk to me it seems AMD is more competitive in gaming now than they have been for a long time.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely, AMD is very focused on Datacenter/AI now. They just presented their next gen AI system MI300X which made AMD stock go up significantly, and on the CPU side their server CPU Epyc is where the big money is at.
That said AMD is still into gaming hardware because they work with both Sony and Microsoft on making new consoles, what we get on the desktop from AMD, is probably mostly derived from that on the GPU side.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Also the steam deck! They really got themselves in the console market this gen!

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Yes, that was a very impressive win. Intel/Nvidia has usually been the preferred solution when power efficiency is important.
But now AMD is competing well in that segment too.