this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
140 points (96.1% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
54539 readers
196 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Size wise if you are already taking the hit for time, you are now better off using AV1 instead of h265. Combine it with 120k OPUS for the best size-quality.
Assuming your planning for the future as av1 support is mostly software decoding rather than hardware.
Yeah, but x256 is a better choice regarding compression. And x265 has good software support as well.
Believe it or not, AV1 is better for compression across the board. https://subclassy.github.io/compression
The author uses ffmpeg as it's encoding library. Ffmpeg doesn't implement all x265 features. Have no idea about AV1, but it's generally not advisable to use ffmpeg as an x265 encoder.