224
submitted 8 months ago by Stamau123@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

HERSHEY, Pa. (CBS) -- A Florida woman is upset about the lack of designs on Reese's holiday-themed peanut butter candy - and now she's taking parent company Hershey to court over it.

Cynthia Kelly filed a federal class-action lawsuit Thursday in the U.S. District Court in the Middle District of Florida, alleging several Reese's products don't match their photos as depicted on the wrappers.

For example, Reese's peanut butter pumpkins are merely pumpkin-shaped hunks of peanut-butter-stuffed chocolate, and the actual product has no Jack O'lantern-style carvings as the wrapper depicts, Kelly alleges.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rosco@sh.itjust.works 33 points 8 months ago

I would sue Hershey's for selling vomit chocolate, this stuff is shockingly bad.

[-] PlantJam@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

The miniature peanut butter cups from trader Joe's, however, are perfect.

[-] Blackout@kbin.social 12 points 8 months ago

When they came out they had both milk and dark chocolate variations. Its nice to see the dark side win one.

[-] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

That has something to do with the way that milk and chocolate is processed - in some markets they still have their delicious original taste. But its a agamble though, and nothing ruins my day as much as biting down on a much awaited hersheys kiss after a long day and almost-barfing

[-] JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago

It's the addition of butyric acid during production to lengthen shelf life.

[-] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

That has something to do with the way that milk and chocolate is processed

I'm pretty sure it's just that it's mostly sugar (low cocoa %). At least the higher % stuff (like special dark) tastes much better to me. With holiday versions it might have more chocolate than the basic cups (or maybe even just lower cocoa % particularly for easter).

In other countries they have actual standards for cocoa %.

[-] JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

Butyric acid is a compound found in milk products and is also present in rancid butter and vomit, which is why it might evoke a “sick” taste association. Some American chocolate manufacturers add butyric acid during production to give the chocolate a longer shelf life.

[-] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

It's a self serving idea, because they know that chocolate with butyric acid added in is going to be sitting on the shelves a loooong time.

[-] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social -4 points 8 months ago

Interesting little factoid I learned after we got dogs. While still not good for them, most American chocolate like Hershey’s is not as toxic as most people think it is for dogs.

This is because of the low cacao content, it’s a lot of fat and sugar but not a lot of cacao which is really toxic part of chocolate for dogs.

[-] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago

So... they'll just get diabetes?

[-] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 1 points 8 months ago

No, but the sugar is not good for dogs either.

The United States requires a lesser percentage cacao in their chocolates, ten percent to be exact, while in Europe anything considered “chocolate” is twenty percent or higher. Less cacao means less theobromine (and caffeine) which is the chemical in chocolate toxic to dogs.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl -1 points 8 months ago

This. When I went to the USA I tried one of those, as through media I had the idea that it was the best chocolate America had.

I took one but and then threw the rest in the trash where it belongs. Absolutely filthy stuff.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

I'm really curious what media could have possibly led you to that conclusion.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 8 months ago

Hershey's features a lot in American tv and movies and as such is a known brand that was not available over here. That way you get curious.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Ubiquitous does not "best", very often it is not the case.

[-] Kata1yst@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

Yuck. No, it's certainly not our best. It's the bargain bin stuff that manages to push the most volume and marketing. You see it a lot around the holidays, but not too much besides.

Ghirardelli might be our best of the large brands, though it's now owned by Lindt.

We of course have a ton of smaller brands with higher quality too.

[-] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Any of the mars chocolates are streets beyond any of the spoiled milk Hershey's even.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Lindt makes basic-ass chocolate for premium prices, I'm quite sure you have better chocolate producers but as everywhere else they're quite low-volume and you won't find them in supermarkets. Also be prepared to pay up to 10 bucks per 50g, but it'll be worth it -- like once every couple of years, as a gift, etc.

If you have an Aldi close by try Moser-Roth, they're approximately Lindt quality at prices actually reflecting the quality of cocoa in it.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl -1 points 8 months ago

It's quite well known though, so the marketing works.

this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
224 points (93.8% liked)

News

22895 readers
4416 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS