this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
220 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32322 readers
865 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah it's more like calling someone carrying water for Russia and blaming the US for a war that Russia started a year ago a Russian bot.

[–] klieg2323@lemmy.piperservers.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody is blaming the US for starting this war. We are all literally saying that an escalation like committing troops would escalate quickly into nuclear war and we are criticizing the US for taking even baby steps in that direction.

Compare that with you trying to dive head first into a nuclear conflict we don't belong in. Which weapons manufacturer or military branch do you work for?

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You have stated multiple times in your comments that the US is trying to start a war. Several other people have called you out on this.

Nobody is buying your nuclear war propaganda. You're just trying to give cover to Russian aggression in an attempt to allow them to capture control of Ukraine. What happens if they do capture Ukraine and then invade yet another country with all these new conscripts? Would you once again tell us to just sit around and watch because you're 'scared' that we might upset Russia? How long do you keep that up? This parallels Germany in the early 20th century. Those wars didn't end because people sat by and let them do what they want for fear of conflict.

[–] klieg2323@lemmy.piperservers.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have stated multiple times in your comments that the US is trying to start a war. Several other people have called you out on this.

Literally where? I have only ever stated the fact that the US commiting troops on the ground would escalate the current conflict into WW3. I'm literally here arguing for peace and not to escalate to nuclear Armageddon. L

You on the other hand seem very much determined to see as much of the world burn as possible and it's sick. Learn some history and become aware of what would actually happen if your wet dreams come true

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

https://lemmy.piperservers.net/comment/338073

https://lemmy.piperservers.net/comment/338825

"Arguing for peace" as you state "Ukranians have the right to die like [you] have the right to safety"

Give me a break. We get it your guy Putin isn't doing so great so you want to make it easier on him to murder innocent civilians in Ukraine.

I don't know if you're genuinely trolling or just being plain ignorant.

I'm literally comparing how weapons assistance starts small and escalates to large scale involvement based on higher level comments saying something along the lines of

Oh, it's only 3k troops. Hardly an escalation

Context is king buddy. How does that whole quote go you glossed over of mine?

Ukrainians have just as much a right to die for their country as I do not having to die for it

Paraphrasing because you didn't link to me saying that.

And the point still stands, I never said the us was trying to start a war

[–] sangle_of_flame@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

why do you think that the US in particular has the responsibility to directly get involved?