this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
215 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

59223 readers
3500 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bizarroland@kbin.social 89 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Is the word "slams" appropriate in this context?

This is not fucking WWE hell in a cell, this is them fining them for breaking the law.

A slam would be the "value of the company", not a small percentage of the money they made off of breaking the law.

You can fine Amazon $130 million.

To "slam" Amazon you got to hit them with 130 billion dollars

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I lose all respect for any source that uses that damn word anymore

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Slam, blast, etc. It's gotten REALLY old and stupid. It also means nothing. "Slam" in this context is at least something tangible. "Slam" in another context could be a critical post on Twitter.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

President Biden SLAMS Trump by saying he was not all that good at his job

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 10 months ago

I have a general policy to not read any article with “slam” in the headline.

[–] bobgusford@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Should probably be "slaps". That's more commonly used when talking about penalties and fines.

[–] stown@sedd.it 2 points 10 months ago

At least it's not "hits at"