Selfhosted

40006 readers

737 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

Best self hosted photo manager for multi user (midwest.social)

submitted 1 year ago by butter@midwest.social to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

My wife is using Google Photos, and I've been using Photoprism for a few months. I just had a baby, and I access to download the pictures that my wife takes. I'm not too sure of what I want. I guess I want two separate libraries, but I want to be able to view her pictures easily and add them into my library. I believe if I spin up a second photoprism instance, I'd have to download her pictures individually and reupload them into my instance.

What do any of you do? Do you even host photo storage for your family?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] emhl@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nextcloud would probably work as well

[–] burndown@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I would not trust Nextcloud tbh, the update process is wayyyyy too unstable.

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 6 points 1 year ago

I don't use it for my photos because of the UI but the update process has been rock solid for the last couple of years since I moved and started uaing their snap. It updates itself automatically withot any of my interaction and never breaks.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Using bare metal install? I always cried when I had to apply updates, but now that I moved on the docker image , I don't get problems when updating (knocking wood)

[–] burndown@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

That's more difficult on my unraid server and I hear immich is better suited for the job anyway so I'm looking to try that

[–] GorgeousDumpsterFire@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

omg I didn't know if it was just me but I have the worst luck with Nextcloud updates. I've had to restore from backup like 6 times in the 4 years that I've been running an instance.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago

With a very small library it's fine using the "memories" app, but I noticed in my experiments that adding thousands of pictures is a miserable experience