this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
687 points (95.9% liked)

Privacy

32142 readers
992 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExLisper@linux.community 35 points 10 months ago (3 children)

My heat pump can be controlled by an app but it all goes through an external web page for some reason so I noped out of it.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How to check this? I've got an LG heat pump..

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 2 points 10 months ago

It was in the manual. There's an extra piece you connect inside and an app.

[–] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The reason is so you can control it from anywhere without setting up port forwarding and a static IP. Most people don't understand, or can be bothered, doing that. I get why you don't like it, I wouldn't like it either, but it's not some conspiracy.

[–] wewbull@iusearchlinux.fyi 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It would be far better if somebody sold a single VPN device for the mass public to be able to access home devices. Something wireguard based could be so simple for people to use. Even better if your ISP had this as a standard feature which they made easy to setup Then none of these devices would have an excuse to go out to the company's servers. Any that did would be obviously spying and they could be shamed.

[–] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Doesn't wireguard's zero config work by relaying through an outside web service? Seems like the LG solution with extra steps.

[–] ky56@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Better yet if the lasy ass ISPs would move over to IPv6, ditch CG-NAT and give static addresses for all. I suspect there is a deeper issue as I believe that even on IPv6, mobile phone internet is still hidden behind CG-NAT.